Health Lies at the White House – A long and rich history of misleading the nation

Another masterful column from Mark Barakak (LA Times) about the history of medical lies and coverups at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Marks’s words absolutely deserve to be shared.

It’s not just Biden. There’s a history of presidential health cover-ups

By Mark Z. Barabak
ColumnistFollow
May 21, 2025 3 AM PT


Far from transparent, the White House allows a president to hide in plain sight.
Biden is just the latest to be protected by family and his political inner circle.
Suddenly, it’s 2024 all over again.
Once more we’re litigating Joe Biden’s catatonic debate performance, his lumbering gait, his moth-eaten memory and his selfish delusion he deserved a second term in the White House while shuffling through his ninth decade on earth.
Biden’s abrupt announcement he faces an advanced form of prostate cancer has only served to increase speculation over what the president’s inner circle knew, and when they knew it.
“Original Sin,” a book by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, published this week, is chock-full of anecdotes illustrating the lengths to which Biden’s family and palace guard worked to shield his mental and physical lapses from voters.
Advertisement
John Robert Greene is not at all surprised.
“It’s old news, hiding presidential illness,” said Greene, who’s written a shelf full of books on presidents and the presidency. “I can’t think of too many … who’ve been the picture of health.”
Before we go further, let’s state for the record this in no way condones the actions of Biden and his political enablers. To be clear, let’s repeat it in capital letters: WHAT BIDEN AND HIS HANDLERS DID WAS WRONG.
But, as Greene states, it was not unprecedented or terribly unusual. History abounds with examples of presidential maladies being minimized, or kept secret.
Grover Cleveland underwent surgery for oral cancer on a yacht in New York Harbor to keep his condition from being widely known. Woodrow Wilson suffered a debilitating stroke, a fact covered up by his wife and confidants, who exercised extraordinary power in his stead.
Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy both suffered serious, chronic ailments that were kept well away from the public eye.
Those surrounding Ronald Reagan downplayed his injuries after a 1981 assassination attempt, and the Trump administration misled the public about the seriousness of the president’s condition after he was diagnosed with COVID-19 a month before the 2020 election.
The capacity to misdirect, in Biden’s case, or mislead, as happened under Trump, illustrates one of the magical features of the White House: the ability of a president to conceal himself in plain sight.
“When you’re in the presidency, there is nothing that you can’t hide for awhile,” Greene, an emeritus history professor at Cazenovia College, said from his home in upstate New York. “You’ve got everything at your disposal to live a completely hidden double life, if you want. Everything from the Secret Service to the bubble of the White House.”
Greene likened the Neoclassical mansion at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to a giant fish bowl — one that is painted from the inside. It’s highly visible, but you can’t really see what’s happening in the interior.
That deflates the notion there was some grand media conspiracy to prop Biden up. (Sorry, haters.)
Yes, detractors will say it was plain as the dawning day that Biden was demented, diminished and obviously not up to the job of the presidency. Today, Trump’s critics say the same sort of thing about him; from their armchairs, they even deliver quite specific diagnoses: He suffers dementia, or Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease.
That doesn’t make it so.
“It’s a very politicized process. People see what they want to see,” said Jacob Appel, a professor of psychiatry and medical education at the Icahn School of Medicine in New York City, who’s writing a book on presidential health.
“You can watch videotapes of Ronald Reagan in 1987,” Appel said, “and, depending on your view of him. you can see him as sharp and funny as ever, or being on the cusp of dementia.” (Five years after leaving the White House, Reagan — then 83 — announced he was in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.)
To an uncomfortable degree, those covering the White House — and, by extension, the public they serve — are forced to rely on whatever the White House chooses to reveal.
“I don’t have subpoena power,” Tapper told The Times’ Stephen Battaglio, saying he would have eagerly published the details contained in his new book had sources been willing to come forth while Biden was still in power. “We were just lied to over and over again.”
It hasn’t always been that way.
In September 1955, during his first term, President Dwight D. Eisenhower suffered a heart attack while on a golf vacation in Denver. “”It was sudden,” said Jim Newton, an Eisenhower biographer. “One minute he’s fine and the next minute he was flat on his back, quite literally.”
The details surrounding Eisenhower’s immediate treatment remain a mystery, though Newton suggests that may have had more do with protecting his personal physician, who misdiagnosed the heart attack as a bout of indigestion, than a purposeful attempt to mislead the public.
From then on, the White House was forthcoming — offering daily reports on what Eisenhower ate, his blood pressure, the results of various tests — to a point that it embarrassed the president. (Among the information released was an accounting of Ike’s bowel movements.)
“They were self-consciously transparent,” Newton said. “The White House looked to the Wilson example as something not to emulate.”
Less than 14 months later, Eisenhower had sufficiently recovered — and voters had enough faith in his well-being — that he won his second term in a landslide.
But that 70-year-old example is a notable exception.
As long as there are White House staffers, campaign advisers, political strategists and family members, presidents will be surrounded by people with an incentive to downplay, minimize or obfuscate any physical or mental maladies they face while in office. (Italics, mine, PS)
All we can do is wait — years, decades — for the truth to come out. And, in the meantime, hope for the best.

Just Because He Says It Doesn’t Make It True

In retaliation for not changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, a decision Present Trump appeared to make on the spur of the moment, the AP – the Associated Press – one of the world’s preeminent news services – is banned from covering the White House.

On what level does that form of censorship make any sense?

No one should ever have the sole authority to rename the map of the world.

And if a news organization pauses on accepting an unsubstantiated, unauthorized edict, it appears that our government has determined that failure to comply is a punishable offense.

Presidents once relied on news services to reach the people, but today, the White House and President Trump are their communications companies. They no longer need the media. This communications machine no longer faces the hurdle of a gatekeeper or fact checker interfering with the ‘company line.’ This media empire now reaches a global audience in the space of a nanosecond.

Not long ago, government-dictated media was considered propaganda.
Sure, there has been anger from the press corp, and even the appearance of moral and professional outrage, but then, crickets.

Encouraging or enabling any dictatorship or accepting muzzling is a frightening harbinger of what may come next.

Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater?

As Musk and his army of ‘techno-children’ run rampant among U.S. government computers with security and safeguards removed, is anyone else worried that classified material is going to wind up on private servers, if kept only as souvenirs, and ultimately find its way to the Black Web and our national enemies?

Personnel records, private data, addresses, and more are of incalculable value.

What is the risk to U.S. intelligence… and that of foreign allies who thought it was once safe to share with us?
What is the real risk of compromising U.S. agents overseas and their missions?

Why do so many in the media seem giddy whilst acting as cheerleaders at the prospect of indiscriminately destroying decades of work and billions of dollars of investment?

Government reform is a good thing, and even here, it may be overdue. But are we being thoughtful—or just capricious?

This may seem like a macro-question putting the historic, longview lens to current events.
But, I suggest, a major screwup now may be irreparable for decades to come.

Just musing and wishing my media colleagues would pose this concern.

MAGAnifying the News

Donald J. Trump to Anchor Nightly News Program MAGAnifying What Americans Need to Know

The White House Office of Publicity (WHOP) will soon announce the production and distribution of the Evening News with Donald J. Trump, (ENDJT), a 7-night-a-week strip show featuring America’s favorite President, Donald J. Trump, presenting the day’s news.

Mr. Trump will be both the Anchor and Managing Editor of the program that, like its closest model время (Vreyma), will run at varying lengths as determined by Mr. Trump in his personal assessment of the most important news of his administration.

Appearing as the most trusted man in America and the most successful media personality ever in his own right, Donald Trump delivering the news personally, and with his customary authenticity and empathy, is following in the footsteps of other iconic politicians whose distinctive voices penetrated deeply into the homes and lives of Americans at other times in our history. In eras past, the Little Flower and King Franklin informed, entertained, and delighted Americans with their radio programs providing humor, comfort, and reassurance during previous dark days in our history.

The Evening News with Donald J. Trump will MAGAnify the news of the day in a carefully curated program to explain and educate Americans about the important accomplishments of this administration. Even before its debut, it is already acclaimed as a WHOPping success and model for successive administrations.

There will be days when Mr. Trump will simultaneously appear as the nation’s cheerleader, advocate, blame assessor, and even the consoler-in-chief. When necessary, he will FIRE on-camera those who have failed their assignments (real or perceived) in his administration. When there is a gap in real news but still plenty of room for fake news, alternative facts, and speculation, audiences can count on the ENDJT to fill any silence with entertaining asides, especially whenever he goes off TelePrompTer, offering insights and opinions which are second to none.

Few personalities are more suited to presenting the complex News of The Day, much less giving commentary and perspective.

Few men have the clout of Mr. Trump, whose personal love for and friendship with world leaders, including Kim Jong Un, Bibi Netanyahu, Viktor Orbán, and ‘Uncle Vlad’ Putin, all of whom have repeatedly expressed such admiration for this American President. It’s expected that world leaders will clamor to take President Trump’s perfect phone calls live, responding jovially, and following his extemporaneous instructions for their domestic policies.

Domestically, the men and women of the Republican Party, from cabinet secretaries to congressmen (no longer woke-gender-corrected to include congresswomen) and even governors, who demonstrate over-the-top fealty to their President, will appear nightly to obsequiously offer eerie prayer and praise.

Nightly features on the faults and foibles of previous Democratic administrations, including Barack Hussein, Crooked Hillary, and Sleepy Joe, among so many others in state and local governments, will be highlighted.

Weather reports will be presented with Sharpie pens. Governor of Canada, and its former prime minister, Justin Trudeau, will report on lake-effect snowstorms and the Arctic Express.

Traffic will be reported by an avatar looking suspiciously like a Pete Buttigieg piñata.

Business news will feature real estate, hotel, and hospitality items.

Segments on cryptocurrency will feature reports from the President’s son, Barron.

A nightly special segment for hunting enthusiasts will tabulate the number of immigrant ICE roundups and deportations, presented using 3D colored graphics for both nationality and racial identification, and enabling audiences to see accomplishments of the administration’s #1 priority.

Also – in the wide world of sports and especially on multiple weekends each month, golf will delight duffers watching the President report from his links. Special offer coupons to selected courses owned by the Trump organization will be auctioned live to raise money for green maintenance.

Dr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (who has received a medical doctorate from Trump University and was awarded by Presidential Order) will take viewer call-ins on vaccines as well as a wide range of medical topics several nights each week. His segment will be sponsored by major pharmaceutical companies.

Style, beauty, and entertainment, as determined solely by Mr. Trump on the attractiveness of featured individuals (as compared to himself) and the measure of their anatomies, will delight and rivet audiences with their comparisons.

Social media posts will include specially created segments using the subscription model of OnlyFans.

The Evening News with Donald J. Trump may be expected to debut soon on selected broadcast and streaming platforms.

Hedging Bets?

If plans don’t work out to make Canada the 51st state, does Trump have his eyes on Gaza?

Might Bibi say “yes,” where Justin has murmured, “non, merci”?

And what’s happened to the Danes in Greenland? Have they plummeted off the President’s priority list? And the Panamanians? Talk about being abandoned at the altar.

Is Success for An Audience of One Enough?

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt most likely impressed her most important audience, President Donald Trump, with her maiden appearance at the White House podium yesterday.

She was feisty, combative, unflappable, and stayed on point to the party line.
She bridged reporter’s questions to her talking points, regardless of whether those answers were either responses to the questions asked or satisfactory to the reporters at all. She pivoted when she deemed it necessary. She structured her responses using the boasts and bravado of her boss.

But was she as effective beyond the West Wing?

Her tonality was sharp. Her posture & body language are tight; some might say combative. Like it or not, those physical characteristics can set a negative tone for the relationship between the President and the press corps.

My question: is that the best way to begin? Is setting a tough tone even necessary? Certainly, the job of press secretary is akin to being a circus ringmaster where the lions, and tigers and bears have been let loose simultaneously. But are a whip and a chair the best tools to wield from arguably the most potent soap box in the world?

For Trump fans who dislike and distrust the ‘fake media,’ she undoubtedly scored high grades for putting and keeping the media hoard in its place. For Trump critics, she prompted recollections of other spokesperson failures, including Sean Spicer.

The press sectary’s job has never been ‘easy’ with a sophisticated press corps that has age, maturity, and usually decades-long experience in covering the nuances of DC politics. Ms. Leavitt is young and a relative newcomer, so it would be natural to expect a learning curve requiring a period of time. I’d suggest that the honeymoon window is open only a sliver and closing quickly.

While she has experience from the campaign, the open question will be how does that translate to prime time and for an audience beyond the President? Or, is she simply cannon fodder for Mr. Trump to carry his water until she has been rung out by a critical, disbelieving, and maybe even hostile audience?

Your thoughts?

Out with the Damn French! When We Take Over Canada, the First Thing to Do is Trade Québec for Greenland

Absorbing Canada as the 51st State Poses Problems

Should the USA prevail in carving out Canada as our 51st state, an as-yet- unasked-and-unanswered question remains: what do we do with Québec?

What can we do with the 9.1 million Francopholic Francophiles whose allegiance to l’État Québécois is unshakable? Whose affection for the Tricolor (drapeau national de la France) and the Fleurdelisé (drapeau du Québec) surely exceeds their devotion to the Maple Leaf? Not to even mention the Stars and Stripes.

Remember too their overwhelming preference for Canadian maple syrup far trumps their liking of what’s considered sub-par versions from New England.

What do we do with a second front of migrants from Canada, just as we’re trying to stem the tide of Spanish-speaking invaders from the south?

The answer is embarrassingly simple, and although I have yet to hear this solution proffered by authorities in Washington, DC, it seems that we trade… we’re big on trade anyway… we trade Québec for Greenland.

The Danes get 9 million former Canadians to fit into 836,330 square miles easily. No overcrowding! Plenty of room to grow.

In turn, the 56,583 Greenlanders will fit far more comfortably into the old Québec confines of 595,391 square miles. Again, good for all parties… room to spread out and prosper.

The French emigres will be closer to Le Belle France transported to the edge of Europe, far closer to le mère France than than when they were abandoned to au milieu de null part au Canada (the middle of nowhere).

At first, it might not be easy. On the streets of Nuuk, one might hear the transplants saying, Je ne parle que français only to be responded to with Parlez danous si’l vous plaît… with the former Canadians responding Jeg taler ikke dansk.
But with a few weeks of Google translate, this will all sort itself out.

And since most Danes already speak English, their assimilation will be a piece of cake, what we all know to be et stykke kage.

This is all going to work out splendidly.

Problem Solved.

Crisis Averted.

Washington? You’re welcome.

President Trump’s Hiraeth

Again and again, Ameican’s are promised a return to a life, a universe, a world of glorious ‘agains.”
But, just when was this: again?

I want someone in the press to ask, when was ‘again’?

When was America strong, again?
Was that in the post-WW2 era when our military and nuclear might were unmatched? Again here certainly can’t be Vietnam… a war from which the President excused himself, and what’s more, we lost.
Was it 1959 when President Eisenhower warned of the unchecked military-industrial complex rampantly growing to unsustainable proportions?

Was when America safe, again?
It certainly couldn’t have been the 1960s and 70s which saw dramatically higher crime spikes. But maybe it was before cameras in Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, among other cities showcased poverty and injustice directly into our living rooms, and Black Lives Matter was splashed on downtown DC streets?

Was safe again when people who made us uncomfortable were compelled to hide in the shadows?
Was that the 1950s and 60’s when sexual repression castigated fags, queers, and dykes in even the most polite conversations, if they were recognized at all? Sniggers and condemnations… Shall we return to that? Again?

Was safe before desegregation? Before the Freedom Rides? Before Selma and Montgomery? Before Little Rock? Or Boston even in the 1970s?
Before the riots of the late 1960s which burned American neighborhoods to ash? Before blood was spilled in the streets; when was that again?
Was that when America was safe? Or when white people felt safe?
Is that the ‘again’ to be sought?

When was America at peace, again? Surely not in my 7 decades of life… from Korea to the Iron Curtain, to the Bamboo Curtain, to Vietnam, to the innumerable battles and terror of the Middle East and the armaments provided by the U.S., Kosovo, to civil wars and revolutions (Argentina, the Congo, Sierra Leone, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Senegal), to the Iran Contra affair… and what about Afghanistan, Iraq? Kuwait? Wars all – again, and again.

AI calculates, “As of 2024, there are 56 ongoing conflicts worldwide, with 92 countries involved in conflicts outside their borders. This represents the highest number of countries engaged in conflict since World War II, highlighting the continued prevalence of armed conflicts in the modern era.” It calculates today 160,000 active duty military personnel are assigned to foreign posts in 80 countries at 750 bases. Again? Is that safe again?

So when was there peace, ‘again’?

When was America good, again? Was it again before the Poverty Program which lifted the living standard and fed so many impoverished Americans? Was it before a health safety net – perhaps before Medicare? Before LBJ? Certainly, it must have been before the Obama Affordable Care Act, but just when was it healthier, ‘again’?

Was America better before desegregation – in schools, hotels, restaurants, and public transport? Or even baseball? Surely, better must be before DEI – so what are we returning to, ‘again’?

Was America better and stronger in the world when U.S. corporations ran entire governments? When the CIA choose who would rule and who would fall in a coup? When we determined who would be bribed, regardless of the consequences to their citizens, but always to our advantage — think oil prices or bananas… and so much more. When was that ‘again’, Pax America?

And what about some of the poorest of the poor – the American farm worker? Is returning to the era of Harvest of Shame what is meant by again? When prices at the market were at a low because the pickers on American farms were treated as slaves.

Just when was ‘again’?

I am puzzled.

America is not a Norman Rockwell painting – a romanticized distortion of life years ago, a saccharin reminder of a supposedly gentler time that was never completely accurate but has become a political symbol of a supposedly better life then.

Thomas Wolfe wrote you can’t go home again for what was has surely changed and evolved, just as we have individually.

Is ‘again’ really better? Is ‘again’ even realistic?

Where is “again” anything more than a political rallying cry? And for what?

Is your again my again? And are you sure? I’m not.

Mr. Trump’s oft-repeated word ‘again’ is, still, once again, undefined, unasked, and unanswered.

Who in the media will ask, yea demand, and ask, and ask again until he defines his ‘again’… and then we can see if there is a consensus for that destination or if are we just being taken for a ride?

Quick! Multiple Choice Quiz

CNN management told their top journalists not to editorialize or ‘express outrage’ during the inauguration coverage.

What’s MOST wrong with this?

  1. CNN management had so little faith in the reporting skills of their journalists to be impartial observers and reporters that they needed to be muzzled by the bosses?
  2. CNN’s stable of journalists is so unprofessional and unskilled expecting to wax poetic and share their opinions under the guise of news coverage, and they didn’t know that’s not their responsibility?
  3. CNN ‘leaked’ their instructions from a presumably, professional and private meeting to curry favor with the new administration watchdogs, eager to pounce on any misstep or misdeed by a bona fide news organization?

From the NYPost story, “During the meeting, Thompson “made it clear that he did not want the coverage to relitigate the past,” according to Status reporter Oliver Darcy — an allusion to CNN’s historically hostile relationship with Trump.” (Italics mine)

What’s wrong with a historically hostile relationship between politics and the press? Did mean reporters hurt the feelings of the Trump 45? Did those nasties in the press room cause him a boo-boo for challenging his words and deeds?

And continuing from the Post, “Instead, he urged CNN staffers to focus on Trump’s second term and to be “open-minded” about the next four years.” Is that code for playing lovey-dovey or footsie from a corporate viewpoint?

It seems to me that a new cautiousness, perhaps a fear or threat of reprisal, and a growing timidity is setting the course for the next 4 years.

If the public prefers unchecked, unvarnished, unfiltered propaganda over the truth… that’s a dark choice.

From CNN’s Reliable Sources – Media & Trump Day 1

AN insightful window in to how people see their news coverage

Bursting media bubblesJim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesAs you digest news coverage about President Trump‘s first acts in office, keep in mind that various audiences are hearing very different stories about what Trump is doing and what impacts he is having. Trump devotees are scrolling on social media apps and seeing triumphant memes about the “new golden age” he promised. They’re watching Fox News and hearing all about the fun times at the inaugural balls. (Jake Paul carried Mike Tyson on his shoulders last night.) They’re hearing from radio hosts and podcasters that Trump is immediately closing the border and making them safer. They’re enjoying the gloating. “The libs have no idea what’s coming,” anti-DEI crusader Christopher Rufo said last night.  But pro-Trump media consumers are not hearing much at all about the January 6 pardons that have outraged and horrified so many people. The only MAGA-approved storyline is that Trump is keeping his promises to the families of “hostages,” which ignores that the rioters were charged and convicted. But it’s barely breaking through as a story at all. Conversely, mainstream media consumers are hearing all about the stunning reversal of the largest criminal probe in U.S. history, and on the consequences for the country. They’re hearing not just about Trump’s executive orders, but about the legal challenges. In short, while newsrooms are focusing on the rule of law, MAGA opinion outlets are focusing on Trump’s rule. Notably, right-wing commentators are both celebrating Trump’s immigration restrictions and preparing their audiences to ignore the inevitable backlash. “The media will now rely on its time-tested tactic of showing only one side of the immigration issue,” Daily Wire reporter Megan Bashampredicted. The message, as always, is to just trust Trump and his favorite media sources. I’m leading with this topic today because we have to burst these media bubbles in order to understand what Americans of various political persuasions are feeling and thinking right now. Some conservative feel like they can breathe again — that sentiment keeps coming up on Fox and Newsmax. Contrarily, I’m sensing that some liberals are choking over the “normalization” of Trump, and abandoning traditional media outlets altogether out of frustration… 
News overloadIn one day, the outgoing and incoming presidents generated a month’s worth of news, easily. Maybe two or three months’ worth. President Biden‘s pardons could have filled a week of rundowns and homepages on their own! Trump’s impromptu back-and-forth with the White House press pool was full of storylines, too. And he is expected to make a lot more news today, including an infrastructure announcement. It’s news overload! Which is why followups, explainers and human interest stories about the impacts will be so valuable in the days ahead…No press briefing today“Let’s get to work!” new White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in her first post from her @PressSec X account. Does that entail a traditional press briefing? Not today. Of course, Trump is his own spokesman. On “Fox & Friends” this morning, Leavitt said “President Trump will be speaking to the press later this afternoon at the White House, and we will have a big infrastructure announcement.”  >> When she was gently asked about the January 6 pardon “controversy,” she audaciously responded, “I don’t think it’s causing much controversy.” (That’s evidence of the pro-Trump media bubble’s power, right there.)  >> And when asked about the date of her first briefing, she said “to be announced.”The producer-in-chiefTrump tries to produce news coverage of his presidency in real-time. After taking the oath of office, he told fans at the Capital One Arena “oh, you’re going to be happy reading the newspapers tomorrow – and the next day and the next day and the next day.” (Trump voters favor Fox and social media over newspapers; Trump’s reference to print is a reflection of his age.) Later in the day he seemingly tried to reposition the videographers in the Oval Office. He beamed on stage at the inaugural balls late at night. As an anonymous Trump advisor told Axios, “He owned every second of screen time today.”